Revenue Model & Token Economics

Revenue Model & Fee Structure

Stream
Who Pays
Fee / Structure
Notes / Split

Trading Fees

Traders

0.25–4% (fixed/creator)

50% creator / 30% platform / 20% community pool

Token Allocations

Project Creators

1%-3% of tokens (vested)

Platform incentives align with project growth

Staking/Access

Investors

By tier/stake

Higher allocation, premium analytics, governance

Subscriptions

Investors/Projects

Monthly/annual

Advanced analytics, early access

AI Services/API

Investors/Projects

Pay-per-use / license

Premium reputation, risk analytics

Crowdfunding/DAO

Project Creators

5% of funds raised

Non-token grants, quadratic funding, DAO setup

Liquidity Services

Projects

% yield / setup

For bootstrapping, ongoing market making

KYC/Compliance

Users/Projects

Flat or per-user fee

Regulatory, whitelist, priority rounds

EduFi/Community

Users

Micro/quest fees

Paid learning/certification, curation rewards

Market Making

Projects

Performance-based

White label, recurring revenue through trading spread share

Membership/Proof

Founders/Users

Issuance/access fee

Advanced SBTs, NFTs unlock-exclusive utilities

Future Expansion Potential future revenue streams include licensing AI scoring application programming interfaces and developing advanced founder reputation tools.

Token Utility — $OFT (OnlyFounders Token) A detailed tokenomics paper will be released separately. The $OFT token plays a central role in the protocol’s functions and governance:

  • Staking Partners stake tokens to demonstrate reputation and earn rewards. Users stake tokens to access premium features or reduced fees.

  • Governance Token holders participate in protocol upgrades and parameter adjustments.

  • Incentives Rewards are given to founders for completing quests, investors for early or valuable participation, and partners for verified impact and signal accuracy.

  • Access Tokens unlock premium AI insights and curated deal flow tiers.

Last updated